BLM’s Acquisition Queen’s Regime

“Lands’ isn’t always supported because we’re the ‘bad guys.’ We come in, and we take this land. And we always take it for less than it’s worth.”


Dual Trump Double Speak?

Reno Gazzette:

Wash Examiner:

Back Door Statute For Your Phones

Finally, and most importantly, understand that the backers of this outrageous legislation are NOT your friends. Their goal is not to protect your life, liberty or property. Their goal is to maintain and expand their power over you. And this makes them and their ideas very, very dangerous.


Two major district attorneys are trying to get inside your smartphone. To do so, they’re enlisting the help of assemblymen in California and New York. California Assemblyman Jim Cooper proposed a bill earlier this week that would require all smartphone makers to build back doors into their devices for law enforcement.


G Edward Griffin Interviews Soviet Defector on Demoralization of America, 1986

Freedom Force International:

Never a Better Time to be a State Citizen, Not a US Citizen-Resident

Experimental Jurisprudence



State Citizenship Does Not Meet with Any of PLF’s Board’s Objectives

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Brien P. Bartels
Date: Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 2:41 PM
Subject: Pacific Legal Foundation
To Corey Eib

Dear Mr. Eib:

Thank you for contacting Pacific Legal Foundation.  We have reviewed the information in your letter of Jan. 19, 2016, and we have decided to decline involvement in this matter, as it does not meet with any of the current legal objectives approved by our Board of Trustees.

Thank you for your interest in Pacific Legal Foundation. We appreciate your understanding of the demands on our time and resources.



Case Review Analyst

Pacific Legal Foundation

About Pacific Legal Foundation:

Today, PLF stands as the nation’s sentry for freedom — strong, resolute and committed to the principles established by our nation’s Founding Fathers and embraced by Ronald Reagan — that Americans are granted sacred, inalienable rights of life, liberty and private property, and that they must never be surrendered or compromised to arbitrary government actions.

Texas v White Spells Out Different Definitions of State & Guarantee of Republican Form of Government


Texas v White: